Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company

New York Court of Appeals

Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company

58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 566

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 9, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.E. 1092 (Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company, 58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 566 (N.Y. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

The motion is to vacate allowance of an appeal made ex parte, by a judge of this court, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, from a judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division which had refused to certify that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The allowance of the appeal is not reviewable; the application for the allowance could be made ex parte.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion is to vacate allowance of an appeal made ex parte, by a judge of this court, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, from a judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division which had refused to certify that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The allowance of the appeal is not reviewable; the application for the allowance could be made ex parte.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannon-v-siegel-cooper-company-ny-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack