Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company
58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 566
Opinion
The motion is to vacate allowance of an appeal made ex parte, by a judge of this court, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, from a judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division which had refused to certify that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The allowance of the appeal is not reviewable; the application for the allowance could be made ex parte.
The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company, 58 N.E. 1092, 164 N.Y. 566 (N.Y. 1900).
58 N.E. 1092 (Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carlisle v. . Barnes
76 N.E. 27 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)