Hannon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 4, 2024
Docket21-1304V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hannon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Hannon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hannon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1304V

KELLY HANNON, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: February 2, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Ryan Pohlman Miller, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On May 3, 2021, Kelly Hannon filed a petition2 for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.3 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from adverse effects of a Human Papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccination she received on February 10, 2021. Amended Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 18, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On January 25, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $85,872.61,

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 Petitioner filed an Amended Petition on January 6, 2023. See ECF No. 21.

3 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). including $85,000.00 in pain and suffering and $872.61 in past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $85,872.61, including $85,000.00 in pain and suffering and $872.61 in past unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

KELLY HANNON,

Petitioner, Case No. 21-1304V (SPU) v. Chief Special Master Corcoran

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On May 3, 2021, Kelly Hannon (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”

or “Act”), as amended, alleging that that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) from a human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccination she received on or

about February 10, 2021. See Petition (“Pet.”) at 1. On August 18, 2023, the Secretary of Health

and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate

for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, ECF No. 30, and on

September 18, 2023, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner

entitled to compensation. ECF No. 32.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $85,000.00 in pain and suffering.

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses

related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past

unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $872.61. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner

agrees.

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a

lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and

the Court’s judgment award the following: 1 a lump sum payment of $85,872.61, in the form of a

check payable to the petitioner.

III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to the petitioner, Kelly Hannon: $85,872.61

Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. 2 ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ Ryan Pohlman Miller RYAN POHLMAN MILLER Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 (202) 305-3027 Date: January 25, 2024 ryan.miller2@usdoj.gov

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hannon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannon-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.