Hannon v. Angelone

86 F. App'x 583
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2004·No. No. 03-7281·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Hannon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing several of his claims for failure to state a claim and granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment on his remaining claims on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hannon v. Angelone, No. CA-00-281-7 (W.D.Va. June 26, 2000; June 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hannon v. Angelone, 86 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 583 (Hannon v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related