Hannigan v. Heffernan
This text of 271 A.D.2d 774 (Hannigan v. Heffernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan *nd [775]*775Peck, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Callahan, J., dissent on the ground that upon all the evidence, including the evidence concerning the absence in seven election districts of tally marks required by statute, the motion for reoanvass should have been granted. [187 Mise. 773.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannigan-v-heffernan-nyappdiv-1946.