Hanney v. Epic Aircraft, LLC
This text of Hanney v. Epic Aircraft, LLC (Hanney v. Epic Aircraft, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
BRUNO HANNEY; and PAUL TAYLOR, Civ. No. 6:21-cv-1199-MK individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER
Plaintiffs,
v.
EPIC AIRCRAFT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#34), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#34) is adopted. Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (#14) is DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 30th of March, 2022. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hanney v. Epic Aircraft, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanney-v-epic-aircraft-llc-ord-2022.