Hanney v. Epic Aircraft, LLC

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

BRUNO HANNEY; and PAUL TAYLOR, Civ. No. 6:21-cv-1199-MK individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER

Plaintiffs,

v.

EPIC AIRCRAFT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendant. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#34), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#34) is adopted. Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (#14) is DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 30th of March, 2022. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER