Hanners v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hanners v. State

92 So. 913, 18 Ala. App. 439, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 132

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 11, 1922

Docket4 Div. 759.

StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 913 (Hanners v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanners v. State, 92 So. 913, 18 Ala. App. 439, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 132 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, and so far as the record discloses there was no error in the judgment of conviction; but the court erred in sentencing the defendant to a term of one year in the penitentiary. In all cases in which the imprisonment or sentence is 12 months or less, the party must be sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail, or to hard labor for the county. Code 1907, § 7620. There being no error in tbe judgment of conviction, it is therefore affirmed, and the cause will be reversed for a proper sentence. Ex parte Adams, 187 Ala. 10, 65 South. 514; Robinson v. State, 6 Ala. App. 13, 60 South. 558.

The judgment of affirmance heretofore rendered is ex mero motu set aside, the former opinion is recalled, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed, and reversed for proper sentence.

Affirmed in part, and reversed for proper sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, and so far as the record discloses there was no error in the judgment of conviction; but the court erred in sentencing the defendant to a term of one year in the penitentiary. In all cases in which the imprisonment or sentence is 12 months or less, the party must be sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail, or to hard labor for the county. Code 1907, § 7620. There being no error in tbe judgment of conviction, it is therefore affirmed, and the cause will be reversed for a proper sentence. Ex parte Adams, 187 Ala. 10, 65 South. 514; Robinson v. State, 6 Ala. App. 13, 60 South. 558.

The judgment of affirmance heretofore rendered is ex mero motu set aside, the former opinion is recalled, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed, and reversed for proper sentence.

Affirmed in part, and reversed for proper sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 So. 913, 18 Ala. App. 439, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanners-v-state-alactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack