Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Hanneman v. Richter

Hanneman v. Richter

52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 803, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 23, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A. 1131 (Hanneman v. Richter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanneman v. Richter, 52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 803, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 365.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Klein's Estate
116 A.2d 53 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 803, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanneman-v-richter-nj-1902.