Hanneman v. Richter

52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 803, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 23, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 365.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanneman v. Richter, 52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 803, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1902).

52 A. 1131 (Hanneman v. Richter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Klein's Estate
116 A.2d 53 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)