Hannefin v. Blake
102 Mass. 297
Opinion
The referee, having found that the adverse use of the easement was not with the acquiescence or knowledge of the owner of the servient tenement, correctly decided that no adverse right had been acquired. The question whether Carter had knowledge of the existence of the easement while he owned the defendant’s tenement was pertinent and material, and he was a competent witness as to that point.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hannefin v. Blake, 102 Mass. 297 (Mass. 1869).
102 Mass. 297 (Hannefin v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oldfield v. Smith
24 N.E.2d 544 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Sewall v. Gibbon
233 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Albany Garage Co. v. Munson
218 A.D. 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Bullukian v. Inhabitants of Franklin
248 Mass. 151 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Gray v. City of Cambridge
76 N.E. 195 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Ludlow Manufacturing Co. v. Indian Orchard Co.
58 N.E. 181 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Sprow v. Boston & Albany Railroad
39 N.E. 1024 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Treadwell v. . Inslee
24 N.E. 651 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Munsion v. Reid
53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 399 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)
Inhabitants of Deerfield v. Connecticut River Railroad
11 N.E. 105 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Ward v. . Warren
82 N.Y. 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)