Hannan v. Cary
159 A.D. 937, 145 N.Y.S. 1126
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1913
StatusPublished
This text of 159 A.D. 937 (Hannan v. Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hannan v. Cary, 159 A.D. 937, 145 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that there was such an unauthorized assumption of ownership over the house in question as amounted to a conversion. A specific demand of possession by plaintiff was not necessary under the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
159 A.D. 937, 145 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannan-v-cary-nyappdiv-1913.