Hannah v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hannah v. State

135 S.E. 509, 36 Ga. App. 100, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 792

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 9, 1926·No. 17552·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The bill of exceptions assigns error upon a judgment overruling a certiorari. It is disclosed by the bill of exceptions and the record that the judgment was rendered on May 27, 1926, and that the bill of exceptions was presented to the judge on June 21, 1926. This being a criminal case, and the bill of exceptions not having been tendered the judge within 20 days of the judgment complained of, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the case.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of-illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

The bill of exceptions assigns error upon a judgment overruling a certiorari. It is disclosed by the bill of exceptions and the record that the judgment was rendered on May 27, 1926, and that the bill of exceptions was presented to the judge on June 21, 1926. This being a criminal case, and the bill of exceptions not having been tendered the judge within 20 days of the judgment complained of, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the case.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of-illness.

Hannah v. State, 135 S.E. 509, 36 Ga. App. 100, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

135 S.E. 509 (Hannah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related