Hannah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hannah v. State

602 So. 2d 698, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9066, 1992 WL 191284

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hannah v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 So. 2d 141 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 1992·No. No. 92-0039·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the trial court’s order directing appellant to pay $200.00 in costs of prosecution. Appellant objected to the costs and raised the question of his ability to pay. The state concedes that the trial court imposed the costs without making a determination of his financial ability to pay. On remand, the trial court may again impose costs after affording appellant a hearing and upon a determination that he has the ability to pay costs as provided in section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1991).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL and POLEN, JJ., and SEIDLIN, LARRY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the trial court’s order directing appellant to pay $200.00 in costs of prosecution. Appellant objected to the costs and raised the question of his ability to pay. The state concedes that the trial court imposed the costs without making a determination of his financial ability to pay. On remand, the trial court may again impose costs after affording appellant a hearing and upon a determination that he has the ability to pay costs as provided in section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1991).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL and POLEN, JJ., and SEIDLIN, LARRY, Associate Judge, concur.

Hannah v. State, 602 So. 2d 698, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9066, 1992 WL 191284 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

602 So. 2d 698 (Hannah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.