Hannah Sprague and Delmus Meek v. Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hannah Sprague and Delmus Meek v. Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2025·No. 11-23-00213-CV·Published

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Hannah Sprague and Delmas Meek, * From the 266th District Court of Erath County, Trial Court No. CV36531.

Vs. No. 11-23-00213-CV * January 30, 2025

Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Hannah Sprague and Delmas Meek.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Hannah Sprague and Delmas Meek, * From the 266th District Court of Erath County, Trial Court No. CV36531.

Vs. No. 11-23-00213-CV * January 30, 2025

Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Hannah Sprague and Delmas Meek.

Hannah Sprague and Delmus Meek v. Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Hannah Sprague and Delmus Meek v. Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts (Hannah Sprague and Delmus Meek v. Erwin J. Roberts and Julie Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.