Hannah Glickfeld, Administratrix, Etc. v. Robert A. W. Carleton, Jr., D/B/A Carleton Brothers Company

First Circuit

Hannah Glickfeld, Administratrix, Etc. v. Robert A. W. Carleton, Jr., D/B/A Carleton Brothers Company

253 F.2d 426, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 1958

Docket5321_1

StatusPublished

This text of 253 F.2d 426 (Hannah Glickfeld, Administratrix, Etc. v. Robert A. W. Carleton, Jr., D/B/A Carleton Brothers Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hannah Glickfeld, Administratrix, Etc. v. Robert A. W. Carleton, Jr., D/B/A Carleton Brothers Company, 253 F.2d 426, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876 (1st Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island entered October 14, 1957, dismissing a case without costs and without prejudice for lack of prosecution. It is crystal-clear that the district court committed no abuse of discretion either (1) in denying a motion by the present appellants for an order exempting them from the application of a long-standing rule of the district court providing for dismissal for lack of prosecution of civil cases which have been on file during the three terms of court immediately preceding, or (2) in entering the final order now appealed from.

A judgment will be entered affirming the order of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island entered October 14, 1957, dismissing a case without costs and without prejudice for lack of prosecution. It is crystal-clear that the district court committed no abuse of discretion either (1) in denying a motion by the present appellants for an order exempting them from the application of a long-standing rule of the district court providing for dismissal for lack of prosecution of civil cases which have been on file during the three terms of court immediately preceding, or (2) in entering the final order now appealed from.

A judgment will be entered affirming the order of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F.2d 426, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannah-glickfeld-administratrix-etc-v-robert-a-w-carleton-jr-dba-ca1-1958.