Hannaford v. Morrison
761 N.W.2d 95
This text of 761 N.W.2d 95 (Hannaford v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hannaford v. Morrison, 761 N.W.2d 95 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Edward M. HANNAFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Christine L. MORRISON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. *96 The application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Malone v. AETNA INDUSTRIES
761 N.W.2d 95 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
761 N.W.2d 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannaford-v-morrison-mich-2009.