Hanna v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hanna v. State

132 So. 3d 887, 2014 WL 486144, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2014·No. No. 2D11-6222·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SLEET, Judge.

Ednol Antonio Hanna III appeals the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of his motion without comment. However, as it appears that Hanna, who was a juvenile at the time of his offense, may be entitled to relief from his life sentence for robbery with a firearm under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), our affirmance is without prejudice for Hanna to raise this claim in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

DAVIS, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SLEET, Judge.

Ednol Antonio Hanna III appeals the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of his motion without comment. However, as it appears that Hanna, who was a juvenile at the time of his offense, may be entitled to relief from his life sentence for robbery with a firearm under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), our affirmance is without prejudice for Hanna to raise this claim in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

DAVIS, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.

Hanna v. State, 132 So. 3d 887, 2014 WL 486144, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

132 So. 3d 887 (Hanna v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related