Hanna v. State
This text of 132 So. 3d 887 (Hanna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ednol Antonio Hanna III appeals the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of his motion without comment. However, as it appears that Hanna, who was a juvenile at the time of his offense, may be entitled to relief from his life sentence for robbery with a firearm under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), our affirmance is without prejudice for Hanna to raise this claim in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 So. 3d 887, 2014 WL 486144, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanna-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.