Hanna v. State

132 So. 3d 887, 2014 WL 486144, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 2014
DocketNo. 2D11-6222
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 So. 3d 887 (Hanna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanna v. State, 132 So. 3d 887, 2014 WL 486144, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SLEET, Judge.

Ednol Antonio Hanna III appeals the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of his motion without comment. However, as it appears that Hanna, who was a juvenile at the time of his offense, may be entitled to relief from his life sentence for robbery with a firearm under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), our affirmance is without prejudice for Hanna to raise this claim in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

DAVIS, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

EDNOL A. HANNA, I I I v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 3d 887, 2014 WL 486144, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanna-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.