Hanna v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hanna v. State

823 So. 2d 299, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11581, 2002 WL 1842750

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3543·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Hanna appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. During the pendency of this appeal, the trial court corrected a scrivener’s error in the sentencing order in one of the appellant’s cases, so that as corrected, the sentencing orders now are consistent with the sentence length agreed to in the original plea bargain.

[300] The defendant in his pro se submission argues that Walters v. State, 812 So.2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), prohibits the restructuring of the appellant’s sentences in order to carry out the original sentencing intent. To the contrary, the Walters decision confirms that such a restructuring is permissible.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Hanna appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. During the pendency of this appeal, the trial court corrected a scrivener’s error in the sentencing order in one of the appellant’s cases, so that as corrected, the sentencing orders now are consistent with the sentence length agreed to in the original plea bargain.

[300] The defendant in his pro se submission argues that Walters v. State, 812 So.2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), prohibits the restructuring of the appellant’s sentences in order to carry out the original sentencing intent. To the contrary, the Walters decision confirms that such a restructuring is permissible.

Affirmed.

Hanna v. State, 823 So. 2d 299, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11581, 2002 WL 1842750 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

823 So. 2d 299 (Hanna v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related