Hanna v. State
This text of 823 So. 2d 299 (Hanna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Derrick Hanna appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. During the pendency of this appeal, the trial court corrected a scrivener’s error in the sentencing order in one of the appellant’s cases, so that as corrected, the sentencing orders now are consistent with the sentence length agreed to in the original plea bargain.
[300]*300The defendant in his pro se submission argues that Walters v. State, 812 So.2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), prohibits the restructuring of the appellant’s sentences in order to carry out the original sentencing intent. To the contrary, the Walters decision confirms that such a restructuring is permissible.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
823 So. 2d 299, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11581, 2002 WL 1842750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanna-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.