Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States

323 U.S. 667, 65 S. Ct. 41, 89 L. Ed. 543, 1944 U.S. LEXIS 307
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 1944·No. No. 132·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Pan American Corp., 304 U. S. 156, 158; United States v. Wabash R. Co., 321 U. S. 403.

Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States, 323 U.S. 667, 65 S. Ct. 41, 89 L. Ed. 543, 1944 U.S. LEXIS 307 (1944).

323 U.S. 667 (Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. L. L. A.
429 A.2d 625 (Passaic County Family Court, 1980)
Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. v. United States
295 F. Supp. 112 (N.D. Illinois, 1968)
Dixie Highway Express, Inc. v. United States
287 F. Supp. 473 (S.D. Mississippi, 1968)
Alabama Highway Express, Inc. v. United States
241 F. Supp. 290 (N.D. Alabama, 1965)
Coyle Lines Inc. v. United States
115 F. Supp. 272 (E.D. Louisiana, 1953)
American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United States
101 F. Supp. 710 (N.D. Alabama, 1951)
Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United States
96 F. Supp. 756 (E.D. Virginia, 1950)
Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
178 F.2d 89 (Fifth Circuit, 1950)
Lang Transp. Corporation v. United States
75 F. Supp. 915 (S.D. California, 1948)