Hann v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hann v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

147 A. 725, 7 N.J. Misc. 1047, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49

DecidedNovember 14, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A. 725 (Hann v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hann v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment, 147 A. 725, 7 N.J. Misc. 1047, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is on motion for the allowance of a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings of the state board of taxes and assessment against the Morris County Traction Company for the 1928 franchise tax. The tax was assessed under the 1906 street railroad corporation franchise tax. The principles involved are similar to those of the proceeding with like title, wherein, at the present term of court, we reviewed, under certiorari, the 1928 tax of the Morris County Traction Company assessed on gross receipts of 1927 under chapter 25 of the laws of 1919. We have examined the briefs and proofs submitted under the above caption, and, following the reasoning of the last mentioned proceeding, we have concluded that the writ of certiorari shall not be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is on motion for the allowance of a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings of the state board of taxes and assessment against the Morris County Traction Company for the 1928 franchise tax. The tax was assessed under the 1906 street railroad corporation franchise tax. The principles involved are similar to those of the proceeding with like title, wherein, at the present term of court, we reviewed, under certiorari, the 1928 tax of the Morris County Traction Company assessed on gross receipts of 1927 under chapter 25 of the laws of 1919. We have examined the briefs and proofs submitted under the above caption, and, following the reasoning of the last mentioned proceeding, we have concluded that the writ of certiorari shall not be allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A. 725, 7 N.J. Misc. 1047, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hann-v-state-board-of-taxes-assessment-nj-1929.