Hanlon v. Carpenter
This text of 709 N.E.2d 1215 (Hanlon v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Kevin Patrick Hanlon. Sua sponte, writ allowed for petitioner’s improper bond revocation claim. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903. Respondents are ordered to file a return of writ within twenty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days. Petitioner’s physical presence is not required. Gaskins v. Shiplevy (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 380, 382, 667 N.E.2d 1194, 1196. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of petitioner’s cause be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 N.E.2d 1215, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanlon-v-carpenter-ohio-1999.