Hanlin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hanlin v. State

104 S.W.3d 744, 352 Ark. 568, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 199

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 17, 2003

DocketCR 03-344

StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.W.3d 744 (Hanlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanlin v. State, 104 S.W.3d 744, 352 Ark. 568, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 199 (Ark. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Paul Eugene Hanlin, by and through am. attorney, Lynn Lisk, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Lynn Lisk, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Paul Eugene Hanlin, by and through am. attorney, Lynn Lisk, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Lynn Lisk, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 S.W.3d 744, 352 Ark. 568, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanlin-v-state-ark-2003.