Hanley v. Price

224 A.D. 874

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the question of defendant’s negligence was for the jury; that there was evidence sufficient to require the submission of the question to the jury. We are not now passing upon the question whether a verdict for the plaintiff would have been against the weight of the evidence, as we did in the case of Froehlich v. Trevor (219 App. Div. 863). All concur. Present— Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Sawyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanley v. Price, 224 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

224 A.D. 874 (Hanley v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Froehlich v. Trevor
219 A.D. 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)