Hanley v. Kajak

647 So. 2d 916, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11499, 1994 WL 665720
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1994·No. No. 94-3030·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION

PER CURIAM.

The appellee has filed a motion to relinquish jurisdiction of this appeal from a final judgment so that the trial court can award attorney’s fees pursuant to a provision in the judgment reserving jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees. We join those courts which have concluded that the trial court retains jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees under these circumstances, and that relinquishment by the appellate court is unnecessary. Casavan v. Land O’Lakes Realty, Inc. of Leesburg, 526 So.2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Bernstein v. Berrin, 516 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Bailey v. Bailey, 392 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). We therefore deny the motion to relinquish jurisdiction as moot.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanley v. Kajak, 647 So. 2d 916, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11499, 1994 WL 665720 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 916 (Hanley v. Kajak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Old Stone Bank v. Farris
647 So. 2d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)