Hankton v. State
563 So. 2d 814, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4757, 1990 WL 91893
Opinion
The trial court imposed certain court costs and other charges against the defendant, who was indigent, and conditioned her parole on the payment of these costs. We reverse under the following authorities, Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), and strike the award of costs and the provisions of the probation order which conditioned the payment thereof. As modified, the order of probation is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hankton v. State, 563 So. 2d 814, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4757, 1990 WL 91893 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
563 So. 2d 814 (Hankton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Lawton v. State
492 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Shipley v. State
528 So. 2d 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)