Hankton v. State
This text of 563 So. 2d 814 (Hankton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court imposed certain court costs and other charges against the defendant, who was indigent, and conditioned her parole on the payment of these costs. We reverse under the following authorities, Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), and strike the award of costs and the provisions of the probation order which conditioned the payment thereof. As modified, the order of probation is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 So. 2d 814, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4757, 1990 WL 91893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hankton-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.