Hankinson v. Hankinson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hankinson v. Hankinson

136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 561, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 28

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1927

DocketNo. 5252

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.E. 459 (Hankinson v. Hankinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hankinson v. Hankinson, 136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 561, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 28 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This ease came before the court consisting of the entire bench of six Justices; the question being whether or not the court erred in overruling general and special demurrers to the petition. The court being evenly divided, Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This ease came before the court consisting of the entire bench of six Justices; the question being whether or not the court erred in overruling general and special demurrers to the petition. The court being evenly divided, Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 561, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hankinson-v-hankinson-ga-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack