Hankinson v. Hankinson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hankinson v. Hankinson

136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 561, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 28

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1927·No. No. 5252·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This ease came before the court consisting of the entire bench of six Justices; the question being whether or not the court erred in overruling general and special demurrers to the petition. The court being evenly divided, Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This ease came before the court consisting of the entire bench of six Justices; the question being whether or not the court erred in overruling general and special demurrers to the petition. The court being evenly divided, Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law.

Hankinson v. Hankinson, 136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 561, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 28 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

136 S.E. 459 (Hankinson v. Hankinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related