Hankins v. State

918 So. 2d 378, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20657, 2005 WL 3682275
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hankins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 886 So. 2d 1026
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2005·No. No. 5D05-817·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), Hn. 5; State v. Martin, 695 N.W.2d 578 (Minn.2005); People v. Monterroso, 34 Cal.4th 743, 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 1,101 P.3d 956 (2004).

ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ„ and GURROLA, B., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hankins v. State, 918 So. 2d 378, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20657, 2005 WL 3682275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

918 So. 2d 378 (Hankins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. Washington
541 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 2004)
State v. Martin
695 N.W.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2005)
People v. Monterroso
101 P.3d 956 (California Supreme Court, 2004)