Hankin v. State
895 So. 2d 1127, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2005 WL 236532
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2005
DocketNo. 3D04-3263
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 895 So. 2d 1127 (Hankin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hankin v. State, 895 So. 2d 1127, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2005 WL 236532 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Orlando v. MSD-MATTIE, LLC
895 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1127, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2005 WL 236532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hankin-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.