HANKIN v. HANKIN

442 A.2d 362, 298 Pa. Super. 559
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 26, 1982·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

298 Pa. Superior Ct. 559 (1982)
442 A.2d 362

Hankin, et al., Appellants
v.
Hankin, et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 19, 1980.
February 26, 1982.

Franklin Poul, for appellants.

Thomas A. Allen, for Moe, Sabina, Gertrude and Perch Hankin and Benjamin and Pauline Shanken, appellees.

Mark J. Sonnenfield, for Samuel and Harriet Hankin, appellees.

John Chesney, for Pan American, appellee.

Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and WATKINS, JJ.

Affirmed.

PRICE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HANKIN v. HANKIN, 442 A.2d 362, 298 Pa. Super. 559 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

442 A.2d 362 (HANKIN v. HANKIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hankin v. Hankin
493 A.2d 675 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Hankin v. Hankin
465 A.2d 1272 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)