Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/HANKIN v. HANKIN

HANKIN v. HANKIN

442 A.2d 362, 298 Pa. Super. 559
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 26, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 442 A.2d 362 (HANKIN v. HANKIN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HANKIN v. HANKIN, 442 A.2d 362, 298 Pa. Super. 559 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

298 Pa. Superior Ct. 559 (1982)
442 A.2d 362

Hankin, et al., Appellants
v.
Hankin, et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 19, 1980.
February 26, 1982.

Franklin Poul, for appellants.

Thomas A. Allen, for Moe, Sabina, Gertrude and Perch Hankin and Benjamin and Pauline Shanken, appellees.

Mark J. Sonnenfield, for Samuel and Harriet Hankin, appellees.

John Chesney, for Pan American, appellee.

Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and WATKINS, JJ.

Affirmed.

PRICE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hankin v. Hankin
493 A.2d 675 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Hankin v. Hankin
465 A.2d 1272 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 A.2d 362, 298 Pa. Super. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hankin-v-hankin-pasuperct-1982.