Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hankey v. State

Hankey v. State

505 So. 2d 701, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1088
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 23, 1987
Docket86-1586
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 505 So. 2d 701 (Hankey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hankey v. State, 505 So. 2d 701, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1088 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

505 So.2d 701 (1987)

Thomas Raymond HANKEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 23, 1987.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

James A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Ellen D. Phillips, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

SHARP, Judge.

Hankey was resentenced to thirty months incarceration, followed by two years community control, followed by five years probation. He had been convicted of burglary of a dwelling[1] and burglary of a structure.[2] The presumptive guideline sentence based on Hankey's 48 point count was "community control or 12 to 30 months incarceration," the second bracket of the category 5 scoresheet. Because no written reasons for a departure sentence were given, we vacate the sentence.

In this particular bracket it is clear that the presumptive sentence could only be either community control or 12 to 30 months incarceration. If incarceration was imposed, there could be no community control, based on the language of the guidelines. Similarly, the court could not have imposed incarceration time if it elected community control.

Accordingly, Hankey's sentence departed upward from the guidelines presumptive sentence. Since the trial judge failed to give any written reasons for aggravating Hankey's punishment, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).

VACATE SENTENCE; REMAND.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] § 810.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1983).

[2] § 810.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oglesby v. State
584 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Tillman v. State
555 So. 2d 940 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Reese v. State
535 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Dyer v. State
534 So. 2d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Soard v. State
531 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Jackson v. State
529 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Moreno v. State
532 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Elliott v. State
528 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Hankey v. State
529 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Williams v. State
528 So. 2d 453 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gulker v. State
528 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Ewing v. State
526 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Falzone v. State
527 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. VanKooten
522 So. 2d 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Kelly v. State
522 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Brooks v. State
519 So. 2d 1156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Johnson v. State
518 So. 2d 453 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Bodine v. State
517 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Flake v. State
517 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Sanders v. State
516 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 So. 2d 701, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hankey-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.