Haniford v. Safer

214 A.D. 435, 212 N.Y.S. 462, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10542
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 214 A.D. 435 (Haniford v. Safer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haniford v. Safer, 214 A.D. 435, 212 N.Y.S. 462, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

These actions were brought in the Supreme Court, Erie county, for damages growing out of an automobile accident. One action was by an infant for personal injuries and the other was brought by his father for loss of services and medical expenses.

The infant was a passenger in the automobile of the defendant Safer, which collided with the car of defendant McCombs and the boy was injured. The cases were tried together and resulted in verdicts against the defendant Safer, the one in favor of the infant being for $100 and the one in favor of the father for $75. But in both actions verdicts were rendered in favor of the defendant McCombs.

[436]*436She thereupon entered judgments dismissing- the complaints as' to her, with sixty-one dollars and ninety-seven cents costs in each case. On motion of plaintiffs the Special Term vacated these judgments for costs and the defendant McCombs appeals.

Plaintiffs were not entitled to costs as against the defendant Safer, for the actions could have been brought in the City Court of Buffalo and recoveries against Safer in each case being less than $250, costs couíd not be taxed against the said defendant. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1474, subd. 7.) The provisions of section 1476 of the Civil Practice Act are inapplicable.

Plaintiffs were not entitled to costs against the defendant McCombs for there was no recovery against her in either case, the verdicts being in her favor. Therefore, the first clause of section 1475 of the Civil Practice Act applies and is controlling and defendant McCombs is entitled to costs and the judgments she entered therefor were proper.

The orders should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in each case, and motions denied, with ten dollars costs, and the judgments for costs reinstated.

All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.

In each case order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, judgment reinstated and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Syracuse Transit Corp.
188 Misc. 123 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Hannon v. Epstein
161 Misc. 356 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)
Boswell v. Greenberg
151 Misc. 492 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)
Sullivan v. Wager
161 Misc. 295 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Sullivan v. Wager
139 Misc. 855 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1931)
Scioldoni v. Republic Light, Heat & Power Co.
224 A.D. 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Mirandi v. Witte
219 A.D. 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Karolczyk v. Gratton
127 Misc. 78 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 A.D. 435, 212 N.Y.S. 462, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haniford-v-safer-nyappdiv-1925.