Hanforth v. Tarentum Traction Passenger Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hanforth v. Tarentum Traction Passenger Railway Co.

62 A. 1060, 213 Pa. 365, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 486

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 2, 1906

DocketAppeal, No. 95

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A. 1060 (Hanforth v. Tarentum Traction Passenger Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanforth v. Tarentum Traction Passenger Railway Co., 62 A. 1060, 213 Pa. 365, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 486 (Pa. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cue jam,

The charge that the plaintiff had willfully misled the jury as to the character and extent of her injuries raised only a question of fact. The affidavit of one of the jury, though tending strongly to establish the charge, was nevertheless only evidence addressed to the discretion of the judge on the motion for a new trial. We see no ground to interfere with his action.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cue jam,

The charge that the plaintiff had willfully misled the jury as to the character and extent of her injuries raised only a question of fact. The affidavit of one of the jury, though tending strongly to establish the charge, was nevertheless only evidence addressed to the discretion of the judge on the motion for a new trial. We see no ground to interfere with his action.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A. 1060, 213 Pa. 365, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanforth-v-tarentum-traction-passenger-railway-co-pa-1906.