Hanfling v. Hanfling
This text of 26 A.D.3d 377 (Hanfling v. Hanfling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered February 13, 2001, the former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County [378]*378(Balkin, J.), dated November 19, 2004, as denied that branch of her cross motion which was for an award of an attorney’s fee.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant’s cross motion which was for an award of an attorney’s fee (see Sagarin v Sagarin, 264 AD2d 769 [1999]). Florio, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 377, 808 N.Y.S.2d 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanfling-v-hanfling-nyappdiv-2006.