Haney v. Russell
This text of 59 N.W. 662 (Haney v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relator brought trespass qu. cl. in the circuit. He was not in actual possession, and, in his declaration, set up title in himself. He recovered a judgment of $47.50, whereupon the court entered judgment in favor of defendant for costs. Relator asks for a mandamus to compel the court to vacate the order granting costs to defendant.
The order was a final judgment. All of the facts upon which the application is based are matters of record, and relator has another ample and specific remedy. The ques[393]*393tion is reviewable upon writ of error. McFarlane v. Ray, 14 Mich. 465; Singer Manfg. Co. v. Benjamin, 55 Id. 330.
We think the application must be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.W. 662, 101 Mich. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haney-v-russell-mich-1894.