Haney v. Russell

59 N.W. 662, 101 Mich. 392
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 59 N.W. 662 (Haney v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haney v. Russell, 59 N.W. 662, 101 Mich. 392 (Mich. 1894).

Opinion

McGrath, C. J.

Relator brought trespass qu. cl. in the circuit. He was not in actual possession, and, in his declaration, set up title in himself. He recovered a judgment of $47.50, whereupon the court entered judgment in favor of defendant for costs. Relator asks for a mandamus to compel the court to vacate the order granting costs to defendant.

The order was a final judgment. All of the facts upon which the application is based are matters of record, and relator has another ample and specific remedy. The ques[393]*393tion is reviewable upon writ of error. McFarlane v. Ray, 14 Mich. 465; Singer Manfg. Co. v. Benjamin, 55 Id. 330.

We think the application must be denied.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garvey v. Judge of Superior Court
216 N.W. 926 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1927)
Saint Michael's Monastery v. Steele
167 P. 349 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Meyering v. Wayne Circuit Judge
130 N.W. 305 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Schmidt v. Wayne Circuit Judge
99 N.W. 877 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.W. 662, 101 Mich. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haney-v-russell-mich-1894.