Hanemann v. State

228 So. 2d 382, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2111
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 25, 1969·No. No. 38677·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See State v. Lowe, 130 So. 2d 288 (Fla.App.1961).

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanemann v. State, 228 So. 2d 382, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2111 (Fla. 1969).

228 So. 2d 382 (Hanemann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
260 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Perkins v. State
228 So. 2d 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)