Hane v. Kintner

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 676
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1924
DocketNo. 18241
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 676 (Hane v. Kintner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hane v. Kintner, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 676 (Ohio 1924).

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

Where a will is signed by the testator and certain words appear below the signature and it is claimed by the proponents of the will that the words following the signature are without meaning, are not dispositive and have no relation to the dispositive provisions of the will which precede the signature and where such will has been duly probated and upon a contest of such will the order of probate and the will are offered in evidence a prima facie case is made and the proponents of the will are entitled to offer competent “other evidence” and the cause must be submitted to the jury under proper instructions 'for its determination whether the signature is at the end of such will.

Judgment reversed.

Day, Allen and Conn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ohio Law. Abs. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hane-v-kintner-ohio-1924.