Hane v. Goodwyn

3 S.C.L. 461
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 15, 1804·Published

Opinion

The court

(all ihe judges present)

considered the plea as issu. able within the rule of court, and not necessarily unconscientious : and therefore, they thought it ought to have been allowed ; and granted the motion. See 1 Bos & Pul 228. Rucker, and another, v. Harnay, 3 T. R. 124. 1 Sellon’s Practice, 346.

<2fuere. Whether the defendant is intitled to the same privilege and indulgence, where he moves to set aside an interlocutory order for judgment, and for leave to pleau, as where he has obtained a judge’s older for time to plead, ori terms. See 1 Sellon, 346.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hane v. Goodwyn, 3 S.C.L. 461 (S.C. 1804).

3 S.C.L. 461 (Hane v. Goodwyn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.