Handy v. Richardson.
This text of 3 N.C. 138 (Handy v. Richardson.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after argument — -The record of the judgment is that which is referred to hy the plea of nul tiel record ; and that agrees with the judgment stated in the sci.fa. though not with the ca. sa. the record therefore sufficiently disproves the plea» As to the insufficiency of the gaol, that forms no excuse for not taking bail; for by the act of IbSS, relative to the rebuilding <>f Franklin gaol, it is provided by a public clause, that the sheriff shall carry his prisoner to the gaol of the district»— As to the dormancy of the judgment, the cases cited 2 L. Ray, 1096, 6 Mo. 256, 304, prove that the bail cannot take advantage of that circumstance.
judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.C. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handy-v-richardson-ncsuperct-1801.