Handy v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

160 So. 530, 230 Ala. 211, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 28, 1935
Docket7 Div. 282.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 160 So. 530 (Handy v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Handy v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 160 So. 530, 230 Ala. 211, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 125 (Ala. 1935).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

In Harper v. Southern Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.(2d) 792, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, speaking through Walker, Circuit Judge, held that the ‘‘Remedies provided by National Industrial Recovery Act [48 Stat. 195] for violations of it are exclusive, and no suit by a private party for violation of the act is maintainable.”

That decision involved a construction and application of the federal statute, and is binding on state courts. That decision disposes of this case, and necessitates an affirmance of the judgment of the circuit court.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 530, 230 Ala. 211, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handy-v-goodyear-tire-rubber-co-ala-1935.