Handy v. Brown
11 F. Cas. 422, 1 Cranch 610
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1810
StatusPublished
This text of 11 F. Cas. 422 (Handy v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Handy v. Brown, 11 F. Cas. 422, 1 Cranch 610 (circtddc 1810).
Opinion
THE COURT
absent) discharged the petitioner; it not being a binding within Act Assem. Md. 1793, c. 45. If the indenture is binding as an agreement, still it does not create the relative obligations of master and apprentice, under the act; and if it did, the 14th section forbids the assignment except in the case of the death of the master.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 422, 1 Cranch 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handy-v-brown-circtddc-1810.