Handy Cafe, Inc. v. Costello Distributing Co.

137 N.E.2d 218, 334 Mass. 707, 1956 Mass. LEXIS 827
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 13, 1956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Decree affirmed with double costs of the appeal to the defendant. This is an appeal from a decree by a single justice dismissing a petition of the plaintiff under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 22, as amended by St. 1948, c. 309, to vacate a decree of the Superior Court appointing a receiver for the plaintiff. It is alleged in the petition that an appeal from the appointment is “awaiting entry” in the Supreme Judicial Court. The discretionary powers conferred on this court by § 22 to suspend the operation of a decree of the Superior [708]*708Court or to make proper interlocutory orders pending an appeal do not authorize a decision by a single justice on the merits of the appeal. There is nothing in the record which shows an abuse of discretion in dismissing the petition. The plaintiff’s appeal from the dismissal is frivolous and double costs are imposed. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 211, § 10.

Angus M. MacNeil, for the plaintiff. Samuel Leader, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Handy Cafe, Inc. v. Costello Distributing Co., 137 N.E.2d 218, 334 Mass. 707, 1956 Mass. LEXIS 827 (Mass. 1956).

137 N.E.2d 218 (Handy Cafe, Inc. v. Costello Distributing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cassidy v. Commissioner of Environmental Management
387 N.E.2d 1158 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1979)
MacNeil Bros. v. State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc.
167 N.E.2d 760 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1960)