Handy Cafe, Inc. v. Costello Distributing Co.
This text of 137 N.E.2d 218 (Handy Cafe, Inc. v. Costello Distributing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed with double costs of the appeal to the defendant. This is an appeal from a decree by a single justice dismissing a petition of the plaintiff under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 22, as amended by St. 1948, c. 309, to vacate a decree of the Superior Court appointing a receiver for the plaintiff. It is alleged in the petition that an appeal from the appointment is “awaiting entry” in the Supreme Judicial Court. The discretionary powers conferred on this court by § 22 to suspend the operation of a decree of the Superior [708]*708Court or to make proper interlocutory orders pending an appeal do not authorize a decision by a single justice on the merits of the appeal. There is nothing in the record which shows an abuse of discretion in dismissing the petition. The plaintiff’s appeal from the dismissal is frivolous and double costs are imposed. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 211, § 10.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 N.E.2d 218, 334 Mass. 707, 1956 Mass. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handy-cafe-inc-v-costello-distributing-co-mass-1956.