Handwerker v. AT & T Corp.

93 F. App'x 328
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 2, 2004·No. No. 02-9371·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Rene Handwerker, acting pro se, appeals the District Court’s grant of defendants’ motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, to dismiss with prejudice plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with the District Court’s discovery orders. See Handwerker v. AT & T Corp., No. 00 Civ. 4030 (S.D.N.Y. Sept.30, 2002). Plaintiff also appeals the District Court’s denial of her motion for reargument or reconsideration. See Handwerker v. AT & T Corp., No. 00 Civ. 4030 (S.D.N.Y. Nov.6, 2002).

Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments of the parties, we conclude, for substantially the reasons stated in the thorough opinions of the District Court, that plaintiffs appeal is without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Handwerker v. AT & T Corp., 93 F. App'x 328 (2d Cir. 2004).

93 F. App'x 328 (Handwerker v. AT & T Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shomo v. State of New York
W.D. New York, 2024
Houghtaling v. Fischer
W.D. New York, 2022
SynEcology Partners, L3C v. Business RunTime, Inc.
2016 VT 29 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2016)