Handweiler v. Seward Park Hous. Corp.
Opinion
Handweiler v Seward Park Hous. Corp.
2025 NY Slip Op 32895(U)
August 19, 2025
Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150529/2024 Judge: Ashlee Crawford
Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
[FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2025 11:52 AM] INDEX NO. 150529/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. ASHLEE CRAWFORD PART 38 Justice
--------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ---X INDEX NO. 150529/2024 MARTIN HANDWEILER and THEODORA HANDWEILER REVOCABLE TRUST 06/06/2024, MOTION DATE 12/28/2024 Plaintiffs,
MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 003 - V -
SEWARD PARK HOUSING CORPORATION DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION
Defendant
--------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ---X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 27, 28, 29, 30 were read on this motion to/for INJUNCTION/RESTRAINING ORDER
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38
were read on this motion to/for STAY
ASHLEE CRAWFORD, J.:
Plaintiff Theodora Handweiler Revocable Trust ("Trust") is the owner of shares in defendant residential co-operative Seward Park Housing Corp., and is the lessee of apartment C 1801 at 264 East Broadway, New York, New York, pursuant to a proprietary lease (NYSCEF Docs. 18 [Proprietary Lease] and 2 [Complaint]). Plaintiff Martin Handweiler, who apparently passed away on or-about August 22, 2024 (NYSCEF Doc. 32 [Khalil Affirm.]), was a long-time resident and "permitted occupant" of the apartment under the proprietary lease. 1 Plaintiffs commenced this action for a Yellowstone injunction and declaratory judgment after receiving a December 29, 2023 notice to cure certain alleged breaches of the proprietary
1
The proprietary lease is signed on behalf of the Trust by now-deceased Theodora Handweiler, as trustee, and decedent Martin Handweiler, as attorney-in-fact (Proprietary Lease at 35). The parties agree that Mr. Handweiler is deceased. but have not provided a copy of his death certificate.
150529/2024 HANDWEILER, MARTIN ET AL vs. SEWARD PARK HOUSING CORPORATION Page 1 of& Motion No. 001 002 003
[* 1] 1 of 6
[FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2025 11:52 AM] INDEX NO. 150529/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2025
lease (NYSCEF Doc. 7 [Notice to Cure]; Complaint). Specifically, defendant asserted that plaintiffs were in breach of various provisions of the proprietary lease due to excessive clutter and garbage they allowed to accumulate in the apartment and on their terrace, which prevented free movement throughout the unit, attracted flies, and prevented defendant from performing repairs mandated by the New York City Department of Buildings (Notice to Cure).
Defendant asserts a single counterclaim against the Trust for attorneys' fees under the proprietary lease (NYSCEF Doc. 14 [Answer with Counterclaim]).
Under motion sequence 00 I, plaintiffs previously moved by order to show cause for a preliminary injunction restraining defendant from terminating the proprietary lease on the grounds set forth in the notice to cure, and tolling their time to cure the alleged defaults (NYSCEF Docs. 4-11 ). The parties settled this proceeding by stipulation dated April 1, 2024, so-ordered by the Court (Nock, J.) on May 31, 2024, in which they agreed that the proprietary lease was immediately terminated without any right to cure; plaintiffs consented to a final judgment of possession and warrant of ejectment; and the warrant of ejectment was stayed to allow plaintiffs to clear the offending clutter before June 28, 2024, and to allow defendant access to the apartment on that date. The parties further agreed that if plaintiffs did not comply with the terms of the stipulation of settlement, the warrant of ejectment could be immediately executed; and if plaintiffs were to comply with the stipulation, defendant would file a satisfaction of judgment and notify the Sheriff that the warrant was withdrawn, and the proprietary lease would· be reinstated nunc pro tune to the date of the settlement agreement. Notably, the stipulation of
150529/2024 HANDWEILER, MARTIN ET AL vs. SEWARD PARK HOUSING CORPORATION Page 2 of 6 Motion No. 001 002 003
2 of 6
[* 2]
[FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2025 11:52 AM] INDEX NO. 150529/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2025
settlement was entered into by respective counsel for the parties (NYSCEF Doc. 26 [So-Ordered Stipulation of Settlement]). 2 On June 6, 2024, only one week after the Court so-ordered the parties' settlement agreement, decedent Martin Handweiler moved by order to show cause (seq. 002) to vacate or modify the settlement agreement, or alternatively to stay execution of the judgment of possession and warrant of ejectment, on the ground that Handweiler's friend, non-party Sabiha Bano Khalil, resided in the apartment with Handweiler and should be joined as an indispensable party due to her actions preventing compliance with the settlement agreement. Decedent stated in his affidavit that twice when movers arrived at the apartment and began packing up in accordance with the settlement agreement, Khalil ejected them from the apartment and locked them out (NYSCEF Doc. 28 at ,r,r 4, 16-20). The order to show cause was never signed by the Court.
On October 23, 2024, about two months after plaintiff Martin Handweiler's apparent death, Khalil moved prose by order to show cause (seq. 003) for leave to intervene and to stay execution of the warrant of ejectment. She stated in her affirmation that she had lived in the apartment for 18 years with decedent and was requesting more time to vacate. The order to show cause was signed by the ex parte Judge, who granted a temporary restraining order pending a hearing on the order to show cause (NYSCEF Doc. 32-33). The parties report that the application was argued on October 29, 2024, but no decision ever issued.
This case was transferred to the undersigned effective February 3, 2025. In response to the Court's inquiry concerning the death of plaintiff Martin Handweiler, defense counsel argues
2
The Court notes, as dicta, that plaintiffs likely were not entitled to Yellowstone injunctive relief, since the subject lease is a residential proprietary lease, not a commercial lease (see Sinsheimer v Park & 66th Corp., 212 AD3d 446,447 [1st Dept 2023]).
150529/2024 HANDWEILER, MARTIN ET AL vs. SEWARD PARK HOUSING CORPORATION Page 3 of 6 Motion No. 001 002 003
3 of 6
[* 3]
[FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/20/2025 11:52 AM] INDEX NO. 150529/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/20/2025
that the death does not stay this matter (NYSCEF Doc. 41 ). Counsel for the plaintiff Trust does not take a position on this question.
Generally, "the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to conduct proceedings in an action until a proper substitution has been made pursuant to CPLR 101 S(a)" (Griffin v Manning, 36 AD3d 530, 532 [I st Dept 2007]). "[A]ny order rendered after the death of a party and before the substitution of a legal representative is void" (id.; accord Schnapp v Miller's Launch, Inc., I 35 AD3d 655,656 [1st Dept 2016]). However, when a party's demise does not affect the merits of a case there is no need for strict adherence to the requirement that the proceedings be stayed pending substitution (Matter of London, 200 AD3d 493 [1st Dept 2021] [internal citation and quotation marks omitted]; Bon Temps Agency, Ltd. v Hickey, 5 AD3d 157, 157-158 [1st Dept 2004]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 NY Slip Op 32895(U) (Handweiler v. Seward Park Hous. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.