Handschu v. Special Services Division

838 F. Supp. 81, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19227, 1989 WL 435383

Opinion

ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

In my Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 18, 1989, 737 F.Supp. 1289, Franklin Siegel, Esq.’s name was erroneously left out as one of the attorneys for Plaintiff Class. The Appearances of Counsel are hereby corrected to read as follows:

APPEARANCES:

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CLASS:

FRANKLIN SIEGEL, ESQ.

56 Thomas Street

New York, N.Y. 10013 ■

MARTIN R. STOLAR, ESQ.

350 Broadway — Suite 1207

New York, N.Y. 10013

JETHRO M. EISENSTEIN, ESQ.

100 Maiden Lane

New York, N.Y. 10038

PAUL G. CHEVIGNY, ESQ.

40 Washington Square South

' New York, N.Y. 10012

ARTHUR EISENBERG, ESQ., OF COUNSEL

New York Civil Liberties Union

132 West 43rd Street

New York, N.Y. 10036

ATTORNEY FOR CERTAIN PLAINTIFF CLASS MEMBERS:

JONATHAN C. MOORE, ESQ.

396 Broadway — Suite 601

New York, N.Y. 10013

ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENORS:

JOAN GIBBS, ESQ.

STEPHANIE Y. MOORE, ESQ.

MARGARET RATNER, ESQ.

Center for Constitutional Rights

666 Broadway, 7th Floor

New York, N.Y. 10012

■ ESMERALDA SIMMONS, ESQ.

WENDY BROWN, ESQ.

Medgar Evers College

Center for Law and Social Justice

1473 Fulton Street

Brooklyn, N.Y. 11216

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS: '

■■ PETER L. ZIMROTH

CORPORATION COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

100 Church Street

New York, N.Y. 10007 '

OF COUNSEL:

DANIEL TURBOW, ESQ.

■ TAI PARK, ESQ.

On page 1302 of the July 18 Memorandum Opinion and Order the first line is hereby corrected to read as follows:

said; but a broad division of the “generally” proscribed and permitted,

It is SO ORDERED.