Handman v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Lengyel

74 N.E.2d 182, 297 N.Y. 475, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 986
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 23, 1947·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as it affirms the judgment of the Trial Term dismissing the counterclaim in defendants’ second amended answer, affirmed, with costs. Appeal from that part of the judgment of the Appellate Division which affirms the order and judgment of the Trial Term granting plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action, dismissed, without costs, on the ground that such part of the judgment does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hydrex Co., 214 N. Y. 622; Symington v. Symington, 244 N. Y. 553.) No opinion.

Concur: Loitghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Handman v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Lengyel, 74 N.E.2d 182, 297 N.Y. 475, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 986 (N.Y. 1947).

74 N.E.2d 182 (Handman v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Lengyel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Hydrex Felt & Engineering Co.
108 N.E. 1101 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Symington v. Symington
155 N.E. 894 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)