Handman v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Lengyel
This text of 74 N.E.2d 182 (Handman v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Lengyel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as it affirms the judgment of the Trial Term dismissing the counterclaim in defendants’ second amended answer, affirmed, with costs. Appeal from that part of the judgment of the Appellate Division which affirms the order and judgment of the Trial Term granting plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action, dismissed, without costs, on the ground that such part of the judgment does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hydrex Co., 214 N. Y. 622; Symington v. Symington, 244 N. Y. 553.) No opinion.
Concur: Loitghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.E.2d 182, 297 N.Y. 475, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handman-v-parfums-lengyel-ltd-lengyel-ny-1947.