Handlin v. Burkhart

New York Court of Appeals

Handlin v. Burkhart

487 N.E.2d 279, 66 N.Y.2d 678, 496 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17235

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1985·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order dated May 21, 1984, insofar as it dismissed the complaint as to plaintiff Mataxes, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 850).

Appeal from the order dated August 22, 1984 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order dated May 21, 1984, insofar as it dismissed the complaint as to plaintiff Mataxes, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 850).

Appeal from the order dated August 22, 1984 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Handlin v. Burkhart, 487 N.E.2d 279, 66 N.Y.2d 678, 496 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17235 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

487 N.E.2d 279 (Handlin v. Burkhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related