Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Handley v. State

Handley v. State

877 So. 2d 966, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11344, 2004 WL 1698193
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 2004
DocketNo. 2D04-121
StatusPublished

This text of 877 So. 2d 966 (Handley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Handley v. State, 877 So. 2d 966, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11344, 2004 WL 1698193 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Steven Handley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the order of the trial court denying Handley’s claim. Our affirmance is without prejudice for Handley to file a timely, facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion to withdraw plea based on a manifest injustice. See Bradford v. State, 869 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Any such motion will not be considered successive.

Affirmed.

SALCINES and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradford v. State
869 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 So. 2d 966, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11344, 2004 WL 1698193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handley-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.