Handley v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Handley v. Russell

3 Ky. 145

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedJanuary 16, 1807

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Ky. 145 (Handley v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Handley v. Russell, 3 Ky. 145 (Ky. Ct. App. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Trimble,

delivered the opinion of the court; The judgment must be affirmed; The minutes were clearly conclusive, and not to be contradicted by parol evidence.

Judgment affirmed;

On reading the orders in this cause, the clerk said that the damages below were so small (one penny) that he had not entered a judgment for 10 per cent, thereon, nor had he entered a judgment for 10 per cent, on the costs, as this court had uniformly determined that 10 per cent, damages were not given on costs.

BY tSe Court. — -You are correct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Trimble,

delivered the opinion of the court; The judgment must be affirmed; The minutes were clearly conclusive, and not to be contradicted by parol evidence.

Judgment affirmed;

On reading the orders in this cause, the clerk said that the damages below were so small (one penny) that he had not entered a judgment for 10 per cent, thereon, nor had he entered a judgment for 10 per cent, on the costs, as this court had uniformly determined that 10 per cent, damages were not given on costs.

BY tSe Court. — -You are correct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ky. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handley-v-russell-kyctapp-1807.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack