Handler v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Handler v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

35 Misc. 832, 72 N.Y.S. 1106

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 832 (Handler v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Handler v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 35 Misc. 832, 72 N.Y.S. 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff failed to show either negligence on the part of the defendant or lack of negligence on his own part. His testimony is somewhat confused, but justifies the conclusion that he ran to board a., moving ear, and either slipped or stumbled as he was. in the act of boarding it.

The judgment is right and should be affirmed, with costs. •

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff failed to show either negligence on the part of the defendant or lack of negligence on his own part. His testimony is somewhat confused, but justifies the conclusion that he ran to board a., moving ear, and either slipped or stumbled as he was. in the act of boarding it.

The judgment is right and should be affirmed, with costs. •

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 832, 72 N.Y.S. 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handler-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1901.