Handford v. State

697 So. 2d 583, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023, 1997 WL 446885
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1997·No. No. 96-3518·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Otis Hanford, appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery. We affirm his conviction and sentence without further discussion. However, we remand to the trial court for the limited purpose of striking one of the two judgments for the robbery offense that were entered in the record.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., and HENNING, PATTI ENGLANDER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Handford v. State, 697 So. 2d 583, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023, 1997 WL 446885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 583 (Handford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanford v. State
756 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)