Handford v. State
697 So. 2d 583, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023, 1997 WL 446885
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 1997
DocketNo. 96-3518
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 697 So. 2d 583 (Handford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Handford v. State, 697 So. 2d 583, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023, 1997 WL 446885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
Appellant, Otis Hanford, appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery. We affirm his conviction and sentence without further discussion. However, we remand to the trial court for the limited purpose of striking one of the two judgments for the robbery offense that were entered in the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hanford v. State
756 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
697 So. 2d 583, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9023, 1997 WL 446885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handford-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.