Handelsman v. Sherwood Textile Corp.

180 Misc. 843, 43 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2342
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 180 Misc. 843 (Handelsman v. Sherwood Textile Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Handelsman v. Sherwood Textile Corp., 180 Misc. 843, 43 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1943).

Opinion

O’Brien, J.

This motion to vacate the notice of examination is denied. This court will not direct the attendance of a person at an examination before trial, where as here it appears that such person has been inducted into the armed forces of the United States. The examination of the corporate defendant may be had but not through its president, who has been inducted Plaintiff may submit an order on notice requiring some other officer or employee to appear for examination, but as to the officer inducted into the United States service, plaintiff may proceed to obtain his examination by commission if not prohibited by the War Department. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 843, 43 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handelsman-v-sherwood-textile-corp-nysupct-1943.