Handelman v. Commissioner

1975 T.C. Memo. 331, 34 T.C.M. 1437, 1975 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 45
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedNovember 6, 1975
DocketDocket No. 900-73.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1975 T.C. Memo. 331 (Handelman v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Handelman v. Commissioner, 1975 T.C. Memo. 331, 34 T.C.M. 1437, 1975 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 45 (tax 1975).

Opinion

JEREMY H. HANDELMAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Handelman v. Commissioner
Docket No. 900-73.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1975-331; 1975 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 45; 34 T.C.M. (CCH) 1437; T.C.M. (RIA) 750331;
November 6, 1975, Filed
Jeremy H. Handelman, pro se.
David W. Johnson, for the respondent.

RAUM

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

RAUM, Judge: The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $896.29 in petitioner's 1970 income tax. Only one of the Commissioner's adjustments is in issue, namely, his disallowance of a $3,600 exclusion from gross income claimed by petitioner as a fellowship grant under section 117(a)(1), I.R.C. 1954.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The parties have stipulated certain facts which, together with the accompanying exhibits, are incorporated herein by this reference.

Jeremy H. Handelman ("petitioner") resided in*46 New York, New York, at the time the petition was filed.

Petitioner was a student in the faculty of medicine of the free University of Brussels in Belgium, during the period 1962 to 1969. He was graduated from the University in 1969 with the degree of Doctor of Medicine, and returned to this country following his graduation. Immediately upon his return, he began his internship at the Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, New Jersey.

Petitioner accepted an initial appointment as an intern at Mountainside for the period July 1, 1969 through June 30, 1970. After completing this one year internship, he accepted a second appointment, this time as a resident, for the period August 7, 1970 through August 6, 1971. Thus during the tax year in question, petitioner's association with the hospital may be represented as follows:

Tax Year 1970
MonthStatus
January through JuneIntern
August through DecemberResident

The Mountainside Hospital is a private, nonprofit institution which provides both patient care services and training programs for interns and residents. These programs meet the standards of the Council on Medical Education of the American Medical Association, *47 as set forth in the Council's publications, "Essentials of An Approved Internship", and "Essentials of Approved Residencies".

In 1970-1971, the hospital paid "stipends" to interns and residents in the following amounts:

StatusAmount
Intern $625 per month
Resident -- 1st Year $675 per month
Resident -- 2nd Year $700 per month
Resident -- 3rd Year $725 per month
Resident -- 4th Year $750 per month
Thus, during 1970, petitioner was entitled to receive payments at the rate of $625 per month for the six months he was an intern, and $675 per month for the period he was a resident. The hospital withheld a portion of these amounts for Federal income and F.I.C.A. tax purposes without allowance for any exclusion. The hospital also provided meals, living quarters, laundry service and uniforms, professional liability insurance, hospitalization insurance and two weeks paid vacation per year, to interns and residents, including petitioner.

Petitioner's duties, both as an intern participating in a rotating internship, and as a resident in internal medicine, were typical of those of interns and residents in similar programs throughout the country. For those patients*48 assigned to his care, petitioner performed physical examinations, recorded medical histories, diagnosed illnesses, prescribed treatments, maintained progress reports, and responded to emergency situations. As an intern, petitioner was also required to attend daily clinical conferences. These functions were performed under the supervision of, and in consultation with, more senior staff doctors. As a resident, petitioner was expected to supervise and consult with interns who needed his help. To perform these duties, petitioner worked regular daily hours and, additionally, was on call every third night and weekend as an intern, and every fourth night and weekend as a resident.

Relying upon section 117 of the 1954 Code, petitioner excluded $3,600 from gross income on his 1970 return in respect of the total amount paid to him by the hospital in 1970. The Commissioner disapproved the exclusion, and ruled that the total amount which petitioner had received from the hospital represented "compensation for services rendered".

OPINION

Section 117(a)(1) permits a taxpayer to exclude from gross income amounts he receives "as a scholarship at an educational institution" or "as a fellowship*49 grant".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bingler v. Johnson
394 U.S. 741 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Bhalla v. Commissioner
35 T.C. 13 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)
Reese v. Commissioner
45 T.C. 407 (U.S. Tax Court, 1966)
Proskey v. Commissioner
51 T.C. 918 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Anderson v. Commissioner
54 T.C. 1547 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Steiman v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 1350 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Moll v. Commissioner
57 T.C. 579 (U.S. Tax Court, 1972)
Dietz v. Commissioner
62 T.C. No. 66 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Rosenthal v. Commissioner
63 T.C. 454 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1975 T.C. Memo. 331, 34 T.C.M. 1437, 1975 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handelman-v-commissioner-tax-1975.